So the FM has presented a partly populist budget as some quarters feared. The populist fare dished out on the agricultural loan waiver was viewed as a big negative and also its effect on the bottomlines of PSU banks. However the budget says that it has provided for the write off so this might mean that PSU banks do not get impacted. The fine print will have to be studied.
On the positive front, the FM changed the individual income tax slabs to give a considerable tax break. The take home pay of India's middle class has gone up and this should increase consumption and savings as well. Good news for industry and the financial sector as well (though the short term capital gains tax increase put a dampener on celebrations - my view is that is will curb speculation and encourage investment, which is good).
The reduction in excise duty on things like small and hybrid cars also spells good news for the middle class and the automobile segment. In addition, a whole list of consumer products from footwear to plasma televisions have got cheaper. All this should aid the consumption story which should drive production and eventually the capital goods industry as well.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Monday, February 18, 2008
How to choose a mutual fund
Objective : A step by step guide to choosing a mutual fund for long term investment
Assumption: Investor understands basically how mutual funds work and that they carry market risk, that past performance is no guarantee of future returns and that there is no guarantee of returns blah blah :-)
If you want basic info on funds, please post comments here and I will try and do that in the next post.
Step1. Go to the Mutual Fund section on http://www.valueresearchonline.com/ (or any other finance site you like, this has a great MF section)
Step2. Use the search to find Equity Diversified funds (if you want to look at more specific sectors, factor in that risk and ask yourself if you know enough about the prospects of that sector) by different performance periods (5 yr, 3 yr, 1 yr, 6 months, 3 months, 1 month). In each period, make a list of the top funds.
Step3. Select the funds that have consistently good returns. i.e. figure in most of the top lists from step 2.
Step4. Look for how they performed when the markets crashed i.e. over the last 1 month if one is doing this today. All will most likely be negative, so the ones with least losses are probably good :-)
Step5. Remove the ones that do not figure in 1 yr top performers AND 3 yr top performers since it indicates they do not have long term performance. One can also consider 5 year returns as a factor if you want to look for really long term good performers.
Step6. This is optional and useful only if you have some idea about stocks. Open the portfolios for each of the shortlisted MFs and see if they have stocks you generally like. This is no use for ppl who dont know A stock from B stock .
You should now be able to decide which ones you want to invest in :-)
I would also suggest buying directly from the mutual fund house rather than from a broker or online banker as you can save the upfront load of approx 2%.
Assumption: Investor understands basically how mutual funds work and that they carry market risk, that past performance is no guarantee of future returns and that there is no guarantee of returns blah blah :-)
If you want basic info on funds, please post comments here and I will try and do that in the next post.
Step1. Go to the Mutual Fund section on http://www.valueresearchonline.com/ (or any other finance site you like, this has a great MF section)
Step2. Use the search to find Equity Diversified funds (if you want to look at more specific sectors, factor in that risk and ask yourself if you know enough about the prospects of that sector) by different performance periods (5 yr, 3 yr, 1 yr, 6 months, 3 months, 1 month). In each period, make a list of the top funds.
Step3. Select the funds that have consistently good returns. i.e. figure in most of the top lists from step 2.
Step4. Look for how they performed when the markets crashed i.e. over the last 1 month if one is doing this today. All will most likely be negative, so the ones with least losses are probably good :-)
Step5. Remove the ones that do not figure in 1 yr top performers AND 3 yr top performers since it indicates they do not have long term performance. One can also consider 5 year returns as a factor if you want to look for really long term good performers.
Step6. This is optional and useful only if you have some idea about stocks. Open the portfolios for each of the shortlisted MFs and see if they have stocks you generally like. This is no use for ppl who dont know A stock from B stock .
You should now be able to decide which ones you want to invest in :-)
I would also suggest buying directly from the mutual fund house rather than from a broker or online banker as you can save the upfront load of approx 2%.
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Reliance power continues to baffle
After managing to get people to pay multiple times the cost of comparable companies for its shares in IPO, Reliance Power now wants to issue bonus shares to "effectively reduce the cost of the company's shares".
Where do these people come from ? Do they get manufactured in a lab which has a sign outside that says "leave all metal objects here and also your brains"?
Lets list all the reasons why this is stupid.
1. Bonus shares expand the equity capital by capitalizing the reserves.
2. Bonus shares effectively reduce the market price of the shares by a proportionate amount since the number of shares in the market will increase, reducing the resulting EPS (in R Power, there is no EPS to speak of anyway, since there are no earnings :P, but lets not worry our brains about that now)
3. Bonus shares are normally issued when the book value per share is really high and promoters want to indicate to shareholders that the business is doing well and a capital expansion through of bonus can be supported by future earnings growth. Why in the world would R Power want to do this when there is zilch earnings, leave alone growth ?
4. Issuing a bonus will bring down the market price as mentioned in point 2. So lets assume the bonus ratio is 1:1 (for every share you hold, you get one bonus share). The market price is Rs 385. The market price is effectively based on some future earnings figure divided by the number of outstanding shares. Since number of outstanding shares will double, the market price should come down by half. So now I will have 200 shares, priced at Rs 192.50. Big deal !
Rather than creating more paperwork with additional shares (after all, its an admin hassle and money will be spent on the issuance), R Power should concentrate on putting up their projects on time or sooner to deliver value to shareholders.
Disclaimer : I do not hold R Power shares.
Suggestion : NTPC seems a much better pick in the same sector.
Where do these people come from ? Do they get manufactured in a lab which has a sign outside that says "leave all metal objects here and also your brains"?
Lets list all the reasons why this is stupid.
1. Bonus shares expand the equity capital by capitalizing the reserves.
2. Bonus shares effectively reduce the market price of the shares by a proportionate amount since the number of shares in the market will increase, reducing the resulting EPS (in R Power, there is no EPS to speak of anyway, since there are no earnings :P, but lets not worry our brains about that now)
3. Bonus shares are normally issued when the book value per share is really high and promoters want to indicate to shareholders that the business is doing well and a capital expansion through of bonus can be supported by future earnings growth. Why in the world would R Power want to do this when there is zilch earnings, leave alone growth ?
4. Issuing a bonus will bring down the market price as mentioned in point 2. So lets assume the bonus ratio is 1:1 (for every share you hold, you get one bonus share). The market price is Rs 385. The market price is effectively based on some future earnings figure divided by the number of outstanding shares. Since number of outstanding shares will double, the market price should come down by half. So now I will have 200 shares, priced at Rs 192.50. Big deal !
Rather than creating more paperwork with additional shares (after all, its an admin hassle and money will be spent on the issuance), R Power should concentrate on putting up their projects on time or sooner to deliver value to shareholders.
Disclaimer : I do not hold R Power shares.
Suggestion : NTPC seems a much better pick in the same sector.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Where were these morons during the IPO ?
Excerpt from an interview with Devem Choksi from K R Choksey.
Q: How would you approach Reliance Power now?
Deven Choksi: I think if you look at the comparable space, then you find a probable answer to that.
Reliance Power with about 5500 mw of capacity in 2012 would be comparatively lower to Tata Power’s 10,000-mw capacity and NTPC’s 15,000 mw capacity in 2012.
If you extrapolate these numbers and further calculate the enterprise value, if per mw issue is calculated, then in case of Tata Power, the enterprise value comes out somewhere around Rs 2.75 crore per mw and in case of NTPC, it is at around Rs 3.4 crore per mw. In case of Reliance Power, it is around Rs 50.5 crore per mw. So from these numbers, it’s clearly established that Reliance Power is an expensive stock even from that point of view and even in 2012.
If one has to look at the near term and then look at the long-term - in the near term, NTPC offers a better opportunity if one has to invest in power space because at FY09 earnings estimate of Rs 11.5 per share, you would probably find NTPC available at close to Rs 16 versus Tata Power’s relative valuations of around Rs 22.
So in my viewpoint, NTPC would be a safer bet and Reliance Power would be far off as far as this calculation goes. So, clearly the choice would be NTPC if one has to go into power space or generation space, which is expected to grow around 15%-20% in next two to three years on a CAGR basis.
Q: How would you approach Reliance Power now?
Deven Choksi: I think if you look at the comparable space, then you find a probable answer to that.
Reliance Power with about 5500 mw of capacity in 2012 would be comparatively lower to Tata Power’s 10,000-mw capacity and NTPC’s 15,000 mw capacity in 2012.
If you extrapolate these numbers and further calculate the enterprise value, if per mw issue is calculated, then in case of Tata Power, the enterprise value comes out somewhere around Rs 2.75 crore per mw and in case of NTPC, it is at around Rs 3.4 crore per mw. In case of Reliance Power, it is around Rs 50.5 crore per mw. So from these numbers, it’s clearly established that Reliance Power is an expensive stock even from that point of view and even in 2012.
If one has to look at the near term and then look at the long-term - in the near term, NTPC offers a better opportunity if one has to invest in power space because at FY09 earnings estimate of Rs 11.5 per share, you would probably find NTPC available at close to Rs 16 versus Tata Power’s relative valuations of around Rs 22.
So in my viewpoint, NTPC would be a safer bet and Reliance Power would be far off as far as this calculation goes. So, clearly the choice would be NTPC if one has to go into power space or generation space, which is expected to grow around 15%-20% in next two to three years on a CAGR basis.
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Budget Fever
The Budget fever is back.....
The Communist Parties starts threatening to pull off if their agenda is not met........
The Corporates have their own selfish wish list
The Market will start dancing like a drunkard....
The Big daddies(Institutions and Mutual funds) will start calling their shots
End of all, the retail investors are the losers who will have no clew what hit them...
Advice to investor's: Be extremely watchful and vigilant. Invest in the market once the suspense is over.
The media has enough masala news to brag about......
The Finance Minister will be tense for a change....The Communist Parties starts threatening to pull off if their agenda is not met........
The Corporates have their own selfish wish list
The Market will start dancing like a drunkard....
The Big daddies(Institutions and Mutual funds) will start calling their shots
End of all, the retail investors are the losers who will have no clew what hit them...
Advice to investor's: Be extremely watchful and vigilant. Invest in the market once the suspense is over.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Cutting edge strategy
Markets should remain flat till the meeting since it looks like a 0.50% cut is factored in already.
If the cut is 0.25%, the markets will fall a bit
If there is no cut, the markets will crash. I will buy since it means the Fed doesnt think there would be a bad recession.
If the cut is 0.50%, markets would rally a little and I would use that opportunity sell 25% of my portfolio.
If the cut is a whopping 0.75%, markets will probably zoom and I will dump stocks (40% or more) because it would be a real bearish sign for the Fed to cut so deep.
Note - where this can go wrong is if the Fed behaves irrationally and cuts rates again to appease the markets. We would sell thinking a bad recession is on the way, but reality may be otherwise.
If the cut is 0.25%, the markets will fall a bit
If there is no cut, the markets will crash. I will buy since it means the Fed doesnt think there would be a bad recession.
If the cut is 0.50%, markets would rally a little and I would use that opportunity sell 25% of my portfolio.
If the cut is a whopping 0.75%, markets will probably zoom and I will dump stocks (40% or more) because it would be a real bearish sign for the Fed to cut so deep.
Note - where this can go wrong is if the Fed behaves irrationally and cuts rates again to appease the markets. We would sell thinking a bad recession is on the way, but reality may be otherwise.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Fed cut and we sell ?
First, read this article if you havent already ....http://www.2000wave.com/
Then, wait and see what happens after the Fed meeting. If it cuts, it probably means there is a decent recession on the way. If not, it means it was sucking up to the markets, but the credit crisis may not be so serious.
Lets assume it cuts rates.
I dont buy the argument that the Indian economy is insulated and we will grow at 8% and therefore stay locked onto your good picks and they will grow over time, blah blah. If there is a year or more of pain in US, you can bet that FIIs arent going to buy risky stocks in emerging markets. If major banks worldwide are going to be writing off bad debts like it was going out of style, where is the money to fund our infrastructure projects going to come from ? If that lending contracts, all the rosy projections for power, capital goods and EPC companies will go out the window. "PE compression" will be the buzzword of 2008. So I'm going to sell atleast 25% of my portfolio on the resulting global market rally IF the Fed cuts.
I would look at other indicators to take a call on whether economic activity is turning positive.
http://investmenttools.com/futures/bdi_baltic_dry_index.htm
See the Baltic freight indices.... they are a great signal of global economic growth. They have been falling since Q3 2007. And no sign of a bottom yet. Once they bottom, I would enter stocks again. We should have probably looked at this in Nov/Dec and sold at the time. The things one has to track these days to make a few bucks :-)
Some might call this trying to time the market. I would call it exiting when you suspect an oncoming train about to hit you.
Comments ?
Then, wait and see what happens after the Fed meeting. If it cuts, it probably means there is a decent recession on the way. If not, it means it was sucking up to the markets, but the credit crisis may not be so serious.
Lets assume it cuts rates.
I dont buy the argument that the Indian economy is insulated and we will grow at 8% and therefore stay locked onto your good picks and they will grow over time, blah blah. If there is a year or more of pain in US, you can bet that FIIs arent going to buy risky stocks in emerging markets. If major banks worldwide are going to be writing off bad debts like it was going out of style, where is the money to fund our infrastructure projects going to come from ? If that lending contracts, all the rosy projections for power, capital goods and EPC companies will go out the window. "PE compression" will be the buzzword of 2008. So I'm going to sell atleast 25% of my portfolio on the resulting global market rally IF the Fed cuts.
I would look at other indicators to take a call on whether economic activity is turning positive.
http://investmenttools.com/futures/bdi_baltic_dry_index.htm
See the Baltic freight indices.... they are a great signal of global economic growth. They have been falling since Q3 2007. And no sign of a bottom yet. Once they bottom, I would enter stocks again. We should have probably looked at this in Nov/Dec and sold at the time. The things one has to track these days to make a few bucks :-)
Some might call this trying to time the market. I would call it exiting when you suspect an oncoming train about to hit you.
Comments ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)